|
Commentary
At
Balboa Park, security protects public from dogs being dogs
By
April Labine-Katko
September
26, 2005
San
Diego--It
seems that all security guards eventually grow mad with power. I can only
assume that years of enduring the public mockery routinely reserved for
the rent-a-cop profession ultimately pushes them over the edge. Those
guards doomed to patrol the long, pristine sidewalks of Balboa Park, where
whole families run amok at all hours of the day, also suffer from this
affliction.
It is a profound dislike for cots and plastic trays of
indistinguishable food substances that keeps me on the right side of the
law. So, when my husband, Chris, and I were enjoying our usual stroll in
the park, it was not our intention to deviate from the law or cause a
security-related scandal. We were simply taking our dog, a mild-mannered
border collie, for his necessary exercise.
Those who are familiar with such matters know that the
dog’s jaunt typically involves several leg-lifts over flowerbeds and the
occasional bowel movement artfully distributed on a patch of grass.
| "The
ordeal did force me to ponder the question: Just where is security
when there are real threats at large?" |
On particularly joyful days, our dog is partial to
cooling off in one of the park's inviting ponds. This, to the
delight of all on-lookers because even the hardest heart warms at the
sight of a cautious pooch pawing the still water before plunging in
for a brief swim.
|
And such was the scene on this fateful day. Several people
stood by, watching in amusement, as our pooch paddled around. It’s
important to note that he was still on a leash, thereby dismissing fears
that he might suddenly descend into a rabid canine frenzy and sink his
teeth into a nearby tourist.
As it would happen, mere seconds later, a uniformed man would
appear, panting and twitching in an apparent canine frenzy of his own.
He glared at us with loathing and disbelief as though, right at that
moment, we were engaging in a mid-afternoon satanic orgy in the midst of
a children’s science fair. His mouth began to move, but I could only
stare in fear at the sty that dangled precariously from his left eye
like an overripe fruit ready to drop to the burning pavement.
“What do you think you’re doing?” he asked, still
staring and twitching with contempt.
“Letting my dog swim,” Chris simply replied. It certainly
seemed innocent enough.
“You can’t do that.”
“There are no signs posted.”
“Well, there are no signs posted that say, ‘Do not
murder,’ but we don’t do that do we? It’s just common sense.”
We blinked, hoping that the angry man and his sty were
putting us on. But, no. Evidently allowing a dog to take a swim in a
pond is akin to hiring John Wayne Gacy to make balloon animals at your
toddler’s birthday party. I had, it seemed, forgotten the less popular
Eleventh Commandment, Thou Shalt
Not Let Thy Dog Swim in Park Pond. Is it possible that the New Testament skipped it?
We had committed a vile and unforgivable act that had, most
certainly, put us on the short list to Hades. So, with the uniformed man
and his sty looking on, we pulled our dampened dog out of the water and
promised to repent. Our clever enforcer got into his truck and followed
us until we were off of the park grounds, and rightly so, for who could
tell what kind of depravity we might yet have planned?
The ordeal did force me to ponder the question: Just where is
security when there are real threats at large? I spend a lot of time at
Balboa Park because I work there. Most nights I am faced with a solitary
walk through the grounds. Yet, never have I spied a security guard when
their presence might actually provide me with a sense of security.
What I do see are vagrants who lurk behind bushes and sit on
the lawn, mumbling incoherently and scratching their unmentionables in
the moonlight. Is it unreasonable to feel threatened by this? Am I to
assume that they are completely harmless and that I am safe to walk
through the park alone at night? Has the Department of Homeland Security
given them thorough background checks? Are they undercover security
guards, perhaps? Just whose safety is being actively secured here?
Now, I do not begrudge these people for their lack of homes.
They need a place to sleep too. But, certainly, I have a right to walk
from work to the bus stop without constantly looking over my shoulder.
Is it the overwhelming liberal fear of offending the
‘underprivileged’ that keeps us from saying anything? Are we just
letting those sleeping dogs
lie on the park lawn because we don’t want to be perceived as
unsympathetic?
Last I checked, darkened park corners were ideal spots for
horrible acts of violence against women. But, who has time to worry
about such trivialities when, just around the corner, there might be a
pup undermining social order by cooling his paws in a pond?
Try BLOCKBUSTER Online Now!
|