|
|
|
|
News After some interviews 'We'll call you' means 'Have a nice life' By Larry Knowles August 29, 2005 San
Diego--When Cindy Sphar
interviewed to be a counselor with the San Diego chapter of Meals-On-Wheels
last year, she felt that the meeting had gone well. She met with a
three-person panel and was impressed with group’s professionalism. This
was an organization, she thought, that she’d like to work for.
According to Sphar, at the end of the interview,
the group told her that they’d get back to her by that Friday or the
following Monday. Hours after the interview, Sphar did what conscientious
job seekers do: she sent out a hand written thank-you note. At that point, she had no way of knowing that Meals-On-Wheels
would shut off all further contact with her. When Friday came along and she hadn’t heard anything, she
decided to be proactive and call Meals-On-Wheels to express her enthusiasm
for the position. According to Sphar, she left a voice message with HR.
When the Monday deadline passed and she still hadn’t received a phone
call, she became concerned. On Tuesday, she said she left a second message
with HR. Later that week, she came to the maddening realization that
the organization had no plans to get back to her. After having sent a personalized thank-you note and made two
follow-up phone calls, Sphar wondered how a non-profit with a professed
commitment to “high standards, effective services, and accountability”
could seemingly be so inconsiderate. Yurii Horton, Vice President of HR By The Hour, a human
resources consulting firm in Carlsbad, said that the answer may lie in
today’s corporate culture. “Human Resources departments are chronically
understaffed,” he stated. Their budgets are tighter than other
departments because of the prevailing view that Human Resources is a cost
center. As a result, candidates occasionally fall through the cracks. Marc Camras, Vice President of HR By The Hour, offered a more
sociological take. “There’s a general cultural shift we’re
experiencing,” he stated, “where common courtesy, politeness, and
decency have taken a turn for the worse.” Camras said that companies could, at the very least, have on
hand pre-printed postcards that they could send to unsuccessful candidates
thanking them for their time while conveying the undesirable news. Not contacting a candidate at all, added Camras, “is a way
companies do business with people who aren’t needed.” For those candidates who suspect that they are being given
the cold shoulder by potential employers, Horton had one word of advice:
proactivity. “It’s not enough to send your resume,” he stated.
“It’s not enough to wait for them to call you back. You need to call
and follow up.” “You want to walk that fine line, though, between being
proactive and being annoying.” He
cited repeated and increasingly hostile phone calls as an example of when
a candidate might have crossed that line. Regardless of a candidate's
tenacity, though, he indicated that anyone who's been in for an interview
deserves the finality of a call, e-mail, or letter. Roger Bailey, CEO and President of Meals-On-Wheels San Diego
said that he was unaware of Ms. Sphar’s experience. “That’s not the
way we generally handle it,” he commented. “Unsuccessful candidates
are typically notified by phone.” “I can’t imagine any circumstances under which a person
would call and we wouldn’t return the call.” He conceded that there’s always a chance that someone
“slipped throught the cracks”. |